Posted by Jim at February 15th, 2004
I’m already on record as saying that I don’t think cloning is automatically wrong. I just think that it’s impractical and unwise at the moment.
Basically, as I understand it, the number of tries to get a normal clone of an animal is fairly large. I don’t think that it would be responsible to experiment on human beings. A person would have to live for their whole lives with the results of a mistake during their creation.
That being said, I think cloning humans is an inevitability if its possible. Once we get better at cloning animals, people will probably clone monkeys and chimpanzees, some of which are near extinction. Cloning might help save some animals at the expense of some genetic diversity (though with effective use of the techniuque, it might actually encourage genetic diversity). Bearing in mind the relatively small genetic difference between chimps and humans, it seems likely that a good understanding of one will help with the other.
Even beyond animal cloning, the benefits of stem cell research will likely continue to enourage the development of human cloning techniques–and probably more quickly. The possibility of slowing or even stopping Multiple Schlerosis among other genetic problems motivates people strongly.
As such, I think that we’re marching inevitably toward cloning. Not all countries will ban it. Beyond that, it seems possible that banning it in some countries will encourage it in countries with less restrictive laws.
As such, I suspect that banning cloning either for stem cells or reproduction is useless. Better to educate people about it so that it can be used responsibly.
As for exactly what a responsible use of cloning is… Well… I don’t have all the details on that.
I need to be educated too.